<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making Articles items tagged orwell</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making Articles:Writing on Christianity and culture from Andy Crouch</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://culture-makers.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://culture-making.com/tag/atom" />
    <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2025, Andy Crouch</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="7.5.15">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:01:02</id>

    <entry>
      <title>Good bad art</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/good_bad_art" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1222</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

			<b><p>Nate</p>: </b><em>?I remember reading a biographical sketch of the light verse poet Ogden Nash ("The one-L Lama, he's a priest / The two-L llama, he's a beast / And I would bet a silk pyjama / There isn't any three-L lllama"), in which he commented how early in his writing life he realized he had enough talent to be either a bad good poet or a good bad poet; he chose the latter, and I'd say was (as are we) the better for it.?</em><br />

<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">a <a href="http://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/for-orwell-bad-art-was-good/">NYTimes.com Ideas Blog</a> post, 5 January 2009</div><hr />		
		<p><b>Literature | </b>Why Orwell liked “good bad” art, according to a <a href="http://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/65819-george-orwell-forgiving-and-championing-bad-art-1/">review</a> of his collected essays: Such works “had the advantage of propagandizing for humble and obvious ideas rather than dangerous, overambitious ones. Good bad books are written by ‘natural novelists … who seem to attain sincerity partly because they are not inhibited by good taste.’ ” [<a href="http://www.popmatters.com/pm/feature/65819-george-orwell-forgiving-and-championing-bad-art-1/">Pop Matters</a>]</p>
		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

</feed>