<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making Articles items tagged google</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making Articles:Writing on Christianity and culture from Andy Crouch</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://culture-makers.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://culture-making.com/tag/atom" />
    <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2025, Andy Crouch</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="7.5.15">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:01:02</id>

    <entry>
      <title>A better stocking striper</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/a_better_stocking_striper" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1759</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b>Nate: </b><em>?This week I've been haphazardly exploring unsurprisingly nifty <a href="http://www.google.com/patents">Google patents</a> database. Surprise discoveries included a <a href="http://www.google.com/patents?id=x4d5AAAAEBAJ&pg=PA2&dq=hamilton+blumberg&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q=hamilton%20blumberg&f=false">talking alarm system</a> invented by my great-great-uncle in 1927. The patent shown here, though, I found particularly pleasing, mostly due to the patentee's names. Lamprey & Bugbee write, "Our invention relates to knitting-machines adapted to the production of striped goods, and, as here shown, it is particularly applicable to circular rib-knitting machines. It is the object of our invention to provide improved means for automatically operating and controlling the operations of two yarns of different colors in such manner that a tubular fabric can be produced having alternate stripes of different colors and of any desired width repeated to the end of the tube without stopping the machine to change the yarns to throw one color out of action and another into action."?</em><br />
		
		<a href="http://www.google.com/patents?id=HGJlAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA3&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false"><img src="http://culture-making.com/media/Untitled-1.jpg" alt="image" /></a><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://www.google.com/patents?id=HGJlAAAAEBAJ&pg=PA3&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=1#v=onepage&q=&f=false">Patent No. 383,817: Knitting-Machine</a>," by Benjamin B. Lamprey and Almon C. Bugbee, 29 May 1888</div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>Moby Dick, a book about computers</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/moby_dick_a_book_about_computers" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1606</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b>Nate: </b><em>?I'm just slightly torn about this expose of machine-miscategorizations in many titles on Google Books. On the one hand, of course the errors ought to be fixed, and the folks at Google are certainly on the case. Honestly, though, I find the pattern of mistakes to be not just charming, but possibility-expanding: miscategorizing Jane Eyre in "Architecture" or "Antiques &amp; Collectibles" offers up a bit of the bookstore-browsing serendipity that we were worried would be lost once the direct-search online catalog took over. If nothing else the mistakes have got me pondering: <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=D9qpNAAACAAJ&dq=intitle:mosaic+intitle:navigator&lr=&as_drrb_is=q&as_minm_is=0&as_miny_is=&as_maxm_is=0&as_maxy_is=&as_brr=0&ei=48meSpTlLZqEkATQ_aSGAQ">what sort of book about web browsers</a> would Sigmund Freud have written??</em><br />
		
		<p>Then there are the classification errors. William Dwight Whitney&#8217;s 1891 Century <i>Dictionary</i> is classified as &#8220;Family &amp; Relationships,&#8221; along with Mencken&#8217;s <i>The American Language</i>. A French edition of <i>Hamlet</i> and a Japanese edition of <i>Madame Bovary</i> both classified as &#8220;Antiques &amp; Collectibles.&#8221; An edition of <i>Moby Dick</i> is classed under &#8220;Computers&#8221;: a biography of Mae West classified as &#8220;Religion&#8221;; <i>The Cat Lover&#8217;s Book of Fascinating Facts</i> falls under &#8220;Technology &amp; Engineering.&#8221; A 1975 reprint of a classic topology text is &#8220;Didactic Poetry&#8221;; the medievalist journal <i>Speculum</i> is classified &#8220;Health &amp; Fitness.&#8221;</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1701">Google Books: A Metadata Train Wreck</a>," by Geoff Nunberg, <a href="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=1701">Language Log</a>, 29 August 2009</div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>Aerial photo, source unknown</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/aerial_photo_source_unknown" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.930</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b><p>Nate</p>: </b><em>?Google Maps has both increased my appetite for aerial photography and my tolerance for less-than-perfect images. Who cares if it's a little blurred or watermarked as long as you get to see whatever patch of ground you care to look at? But comes a time when something better—like this gorgeous shot of what I presume are some farm buildings, taken at the golden-lit "magic hour" of dawn or dusk—stirs a hunger-for-the-view not so easily satisfied with satellites and databases.?</em><br />
		
		<a href="http://static.supertopic.de/upload/vernissage/201531.1220187814.jpg"><img src="http://culture-making.com/media/201531.1220187814.jpg" alt="photo" /></a><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">Aerial photo, source unknown :: via <a href="http://ffffound.com/image/d6271d2e207c0e94496e636eef0bde3080c11207">FFFFOUND!</a></div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>Surfing Proust: Is nonfiction just easier to read?</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/surfing_proust_is_nonfiction_just_easier_to_read" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.763</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b><p>Nate</p>: </b><em>?A response to Nicholas Carr's <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google"><i>Atlantic Monthly</i> article</a> about the ways in which easy outside access to information might be changing (and weakening) the ways we think, remember, and process information. (Kevin Kelly had his own fascinating retort to Carr's article <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google">here</a>.)?</em><br />
		
		<p>When I think about it, my ability to “read deeply and without distraction” is not impaired at all when it comes to 9,000 word articles in Harper’s or The Atlantic on, say, trends in urban crime, thick with policy analysis and statistics, or for that matter, “<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google">Is Google Making us Stupid?</a>” It’s just when I try to read Proust, or heaven forbid, <i>JR</i> by William Gaddis—a novel that I greatly anticipated reading, but which quickly became a coaster for the glass of water on my bedside table.</p><p>A more important question, I think, is why our brains now seem to better tolerate nonfiction. Regarding Proust in particular, Carr’s argument is, for me, especially ironic: The way that I have found to actually read those long complex sentences is, in fact, to skim them—to ride along on the surface from one detailed, beautiful image of village life to another, without trying to unpack them too literally or rationally.</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://imagejournal.org/page/blog/maybe-google-isnt-making-us-stupid">Maybe Google Isn’t Making Us Stupid</a>," by Caroline Langston, <a href="http://imagejournal.org/page/blog/maybe-google-isnt-making-us-stupid">Good Letters: The IMAGE Blog</a>, 26 August 2008</div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>The decline of culture (as a search term)</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/the_decline_of_culture_as_a_search_term" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.450</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b><p>Nate</p>: </b><em>?A neat auto-generated chart from Google Trends ... is the downward trend suggestive that people are less interested in culture, or that, as the web becomes ever larger, people are realizing it's just too vague a search term. The yearly slumps in searches correspond to midsummer and late December, times when Americans at least are too busy with other cultural activities to spend their time googling.?</em><br />
		
		<a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=culture&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0"><img src="http://www.culture-making.com/media/viz.png" alt="image" /></a><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1"><a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=culture&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0">Google Trends</a></div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

</feed>