<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making Articles items tagged cyborgs</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making Articles:Writing on Christianity and culture from Andy Crouch</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://culture-makers.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://culture-making.com/tag/atom" />
    <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2025, Andy Crouch</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="7.5.15">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:01:02</id>

    <entry>
      <title>Auto&#45;Tune and the cyborg embrace</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/auto-tune_and_the_cyborg_embrace" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1423</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b>Nate: </b><em>?I think the growing global popularity of more overt uses of Auto-Tune in music production is actually a good thing, at least to a point, in that it isn't using the computerized pitch correction to create a perfect but still "real" version of a pop performance (as real as the women on the covers of glossy magazines); instead, it's embracing the artificiality of the process to create something new. A few years back, I heard a great song by a British musician, whose name escapes me alas, who had trained his voice to mimic the Auto-Tune effect naturally. And why not? It sounded cool.?</em><br />
		
		<p align="center"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/z_4AxzvhCPY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/z_4AxzvhCPY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p><p>Vocal runs that would sound bizarre without Auto-Tune have become necessary to create some now-common effects. The plug-in facilitates something analogous to a human-machine duet. Raskin has recorded with countless major vocalists, including best-selling rapper Lil Wayne. He says that, ‘99 per cent of all pop music has corrective Auto-Tuning.’ But when artists flamboyantly foreground its use, they sing and simultaneously listen to themselves being processed. Lil Wayne records with Auto-Tune on – no untreated vocal version exists. In an era of powerful computers that allow one to audition all manner of effects on vocals after the recording session, recording direct with Auto-Tune means full commitment. There is no longer an original ‘naked’ version. This is a cyborg embrace. In <i>Cyborg Manifesto</i> (1991), Donna Haraway notes that ‘the relation between organism and machine has been a border war.’ Auto-Tune’s creative deployment is fully compatible with her ‘argument for pleasure in the confusion of boundaries and for responsibility in their construction.’</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/pitch_perfect/">Pitch Perfect</a>," by Jace Clayton, <a href="http://www.frieze.com/issue/article/pitch_perfect/">Frieze Magazine</a>, May 2009 :: via <a href="http://ideas.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/06/in-praise-of-auto-tune/">NYTimes.com Idea of the Day</a> video via <a href="http://kottke.org/09/04/auto-tune">kottke.org</a></div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

</feed>