<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making Articles items tagged cool</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making Articles:Writing on Christianity and culture from Andy Crouch</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://culture-makers.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://culture-making.com/tag/atom" />
    <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2025, Andy Crouch</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="7.5.15">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:01:02</id>

    <entry>
      <title>Uncool no more</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/uncool_no_more" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1741</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b>Nate: </b><em>?Changes in the ease of access to different cultural sources are definitely shifting what it means for something to be cool or uncool—especially, of course, for those with some amount of cultural power. I often wonder, though, whether this is a forward or a lateral shift. True, the old and the foreign can now be hip, but—if my own music tastes offer judgment—it just means that the new and mainstream are just correspondingly less interesting. (See also Jody Rosen's takedown of NPR's taste in black music, the "<a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/browbeat/archive/2009/10/12/the-dorf-matrix-towards-a-theory-of-npr-s-taste-in-black-music.aspx">Dead-Old-Retro-Foreign Matrix</a>") An age of cherry-picking might provide for a lot of desserts and clever mixed drinks, but not, alas, much meat.?</em><br />
		
		<p>We’re living in a stylistic tropics. There’s a whole generation of people able to access almost anything from almost anywhere, and they don’t have the same localised stylistic sense that my generation grew up with. It’s all alive, all “now,” in an ever-expanding present, be it Hildegard of Bingen or a Bollywood soundtrack. The idea that something is uncool because it’s old or foreign has left the collective consciousness.</p>
<p>I think this is good news. As people become increasingly comfortable with drawing their culture from a rich range of sources—cherry-picking whatever makes sense to them—it becomes more natural to do the same thing with their social, political and other cultural ideas. The sharing of art is a precursor to the sharing of other human experiences, for what is pleasurable in art becomes thinkable in life.</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2009/11/the-death-of-uncool/">The death of uncool</a>," by Brian Eno, <a href="http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/2009/11/the-death-of-uncool/">Prospect Magazine</a>, 25 November 2009 :: via <a href="http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/headlines/2009/November/30/">The Morning News</a></div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>Adieu, S.U.V.’s</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/adieu_suvs" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1187</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b><p>Nate</p>: </b><em>?Is persistence in spite of uncoolness a sign that a cultural artifact is genuinely useful??</em><br />
		
		<p>Here is the puzzling thing. The apparent cause of death for S.U.V.’s was high gas prices. Doesn’t that mean that with low gas prices S.U.V. sales should come back to life? I can think of a few reasons why that might not be the case:</p>
<p>1) Consumers think that the low current gas prices are temporary, and in general gas prices will be high in the future. Thus, they don’t want to get stuck with a vehicle that gets poor gas mileage. The question this raises is why consumers were so sure six months ago that gas prices were going to be high forever (which turned out to be wrong), but don’t believe now that gas prices will stay low.</p><p>2) The uncertainty of fluctuating gas prices takes the fun out of owning an S.U.V. Even if gas prices won’t be that high on average, it is so unpleasant to have an S.U.V. when gas prices are high that people don’t want to have them if gas prices are volatile. This explanation seems kind of dumb to me, but maybe it is possible.</p>
<p>3) When gas prices got high, it became uncool to own an S.U.V. Perhaps the process for going from cool to uncool is not easily reversible. Once something is uncool, it remains uncool for a long time, even when the forces that caused it to be uncool recede. This might explain why the demand for pickup trucks remains strong, even as S.U.V.’s fade. Somehow the spike in gas prices didn’t make pickup trucks uncool in the same way as S.U.V.’s. Similarly, minivans have never been cool (or at least not for a long time); so if this explanation is right, minivan sales should stay strong.</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/24/why-the-death-of-suvs/">Why the Death of S.U.V.’s?</a>," by Steven D. Levitt, <a href="http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/12/24/why-the-death-of-suvs/">NYTimes.com Freakonomics Blog</a>, 24 December 2008</div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

</feed>