<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">

    <title type="text">Culture Making Articles items tagged commerce</title>
    <subtitle type="text">Culture Making Articles:Writing on Christianity and culture from Andy Crouch</subtitle>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://culture-makers.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://culture-making.com/tag/atom" />
    <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
    <rights>Copyright (c) 2025, Andy Crouch</rights>
    <generator uri="http://www.pmachine.com/" version="7.5.15">ExpressionEngine</generator>
    <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:01:02</id>

    <entry>
      <title>The Matthew effect</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/the_matthew_effect" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1166</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b><p>Andy</p>: </b><em>?I've been following the "long tail" debate with great interest, and this article in <i>New Scientist</i> sums up the research as well as any I've seen. It confirms my growing suspicion that far from being a paradise of user-created content, the Web (versions 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 and beyond) will in fact reinforce the dominance of a few blockbuster properties (and Web sites), just as new communication technologies and transportation patterns are consolidating American Christianity into the blockbusters of the church world: megachurches. Could it be that the more interconnected we are, the more homogenous we become??</em><br />
		
		<p>So why, with the cornucopia of goodies now available to us, are blockbusters not just still here, but getting bigger? On the face of it, Anderson’s idea of a divergence of tastes in the digital era is logical. But if the long tail effect does not exist, or is not as pronounced as was thought, what is really going on?</p><p>Elberse says it’s a bit like the influence of multichannel television on the economics of sport. In the old days, if you wanted to watch soccer, you went to watch your local team in the flesh. Now, she says, in the UK you are more likely to decide to stay at home and watch Chelsea play Arsenal. This change of allegiance cuts the cash flowing into the ticket office of your local club while boosting advertising revenues for TV, which accrue disproportionately in favour of the already wealthy top clubs.</p><p>It is a phenomenon known to economists as the Matthew effect, after a quotation from the gospel of that name: “For unto every one that hath shall be given.” Just as for the long tail effect, there is a plausible explanation of why it should be happening in the modern media environment: easy digital replication and efficient communication through cellphones, email and social networking sites encourage fast-moving, fast-changing fads. The result is a homogenisation of tastes that boosts the chances of popular things becoming blockbusters, making the already successful even more successful.</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20026873.300-online-shopping-and-the-harry-potter-effect.html?full=true">Online shopping and the Harry Potter effect</a>," by Richard Webb, <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/">New Scientist</a>, 22 December 2008</div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>    <entry>
      <title>Boxes of worship</title>
      <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://culture-making.com/post/boxes_of_worship" />
      <id>tag:culture-makers.com,2025:author/1.1059</id>
      <published>2025-01-02T22:53:00Z</published>
      <updated>2025-01-03T22:54:05Z</updated>
      <author>
            <name>Andy Crouch</name>
            <email>andy@culture-making.com</email>
            
      </author>

      <content type="html"><![CDATA[
        
			
			
			

					<b><p>Nate</p>: </b><em>?I'd say the idea of repurposing a defunct big-box store as a church is far more appealing to me than purpose-building churches that look like ... big box stores.?</em><br />
		
		<div style="float:right; padding:15px 5px 5px 5px"><img src="http://culture-making.com/media/4_2_210.jpg" alt="image"></div><p>The challenges of repurposing big-box stores are not limited to dealing with their unwieldy size. Often, the real estate can be tied up in complicated arrangements. The potential buyer of a big-box store might encounter any number of stipulations on what the building, parking lot, and land can be used for in the future. These stipulations can make it difficult for other businesses to move into an abandoned big-box—but they also open up such spaces for more creative use. The Calvary Chapel in Pinellas Park, Fla., purchased an abandoned Wal-Mart building across the street from its previous home. The deed specified that the structure could not be used by one of Wal-Mart&#8217;s various competitors for several decades. But for the moment, at least, churches aren&#8217;t on that list. Many former big-box stores have been reclaimed by civic institutions—a library, a courthouse—and by churches. Before moving into this old Wal-Mart, the Calvary Chapel had made its home in an abandoned Winn-Dixie grocery store across the highway.</p><hr />
<div class="author" style="font-size: -1">from "<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2204599/slideshow/2204910/fs/0//entry/2204914/">For Sale: 200,000-Square-Foot Box</a>," photo and text by Julia Christensen, <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2204599/slideshow/2204910/fs/0//entry/2204914/">Slate</a>, 19 November 2008 :: via <a href="http://www.good.is/?p=13499">GOOD/blog</a></div>		
	
			
			
			

		
      ]]></content>
    </entry>

</feed>